...Another "Unobtainium" new Rolex Daytona...
Enamel Dial
Rolesium Daytona
I have to admit, this new Rolex Daytona has confused me to no end, in the sense it's "Off Catalog", which means it will not be offered for sale in Rolex authorized dealerships, nor on Rolex.com, and it's essentially a stainless steel model, with a platinum bezel and caseback, that retails for $57,800, despite the fact you won't be able to purchase one!?!! Kinda like the Le Mans Rolex Daytona...
The great news is that Benjamin Clymer from Hodinkee wrote a superb article that deciphers the mystery behind this highly esoteric new Rolex Daytona model and he also created an excellent video (below) that explains all the details of this novel Daytona Rolex showed off at Watches and Wonders 2026:
Ben Clymer's excellent overview story, which I provided a Hodinkee link to in the former paragraph, included a section titled: "Five Things I Don't Love About The Rolex Daytona Reference 126502". His second piece of constructive criticism was:
2. That it has an open case back. This isn't a new gripe – the Le Mans is literally my favorite watch, but I believe a Rolex should have a closed case back. They don't need to play the game everyone else does by showing off what's inside.
I completely disagree with Ben's opinion that Rolex watches should NOT have exhibition casebooks, but should remain closed! Rolex movements are absolute works of art, and deserve to be showcased for multiple great reasons.
My primary argument is that Rolex pretty much invented the exhibition casebook back in the 1920s so their sales agents could show jewelers how precise and well designed Rolex movements were. Below is an early Rolex Oyster with an exhibition caseback from the late 1920s, that shows the movement. Just to be clear, according to the best scholarship Rolex never made these beautiful watches with exhibition casebacks available for purchase, but some of them have been preserved, and in the past I have written extensively on them.
Again, in the early 1930s, after Rolex launched their revolutionary Rolex Oyster Perpetual movement, they once again created exhibition casebacks to showcase how they worked for salesmen, and the one we see below has survived intact.
Just to be crystal clear—pun intended—both the Rolex Oyster pictured above, as well as the Rolex Oyster Perpetual pictured below have crystal clear glass casebacks to show how their movements function, despite the fact they almost look like they have simply had their casebook removed.
Rolex has always been preoccupied with the precision and reliability of their movements, so it wasn't until recently they focused on maximizing the aesthetic presentation of their movements as pictured below.
JAKE'S TAKE
On the one hand, I think this is a cool looking Rolex and I love the exhibition caseback. On the other hand, I am deeply confused about why when there is such a long waiting list, meaning years, for the classic stainless steel Daytona, why Rolex doesn't focus first on resolving that issue, instead of creating a $60K watch nobody can even purchase!?!!
If it were up to me, and I was running Rolex, I would add the exhibition caseback as an option for all Rolex watches, and I would focus on creating more affordable models that are available for immediate purchase.
This new model features a beautiful new lacquered dial, and an interesting new bezel insert which is extremely durable, but I think these would be a great add-on to the standard stainless Daytona. Hopefully this new platinum and stainless Daytona model is like an advanced R&D Rolex with experimental features that will one day trickle-down to the standard stainless models.
Once again, for clarity sake, I would love to see Rolex move in a direction where they offer premium upgrades to their basic models. So for instance, with a stainless steel Daytona, customers would be able to upgrade the dial, and bezel, as well as add an exhibition caseback, which would perhaps increase the retail price by around $4,000, or so.
Rolex describes their train of thought for this new model below:
I WANT A GOOD WATCH
not an
UNOBTAINABLE WATCH
The brochure below was published in 1961 for the Rolex Submariner [Reference 5512]. I once offered my opinion on this brochure and wrote:
"This super-cool, ultra-fascinating 1961 Rolex Submariner brochure perfectly sums up the raw core essence of Rolex and is one of my absolute favorite pieces of vintage Rolex collateral marketing material! I would go so far as to say this quintessential timeless document is as close as Rolex has ever come to writing a constitution..."

The brochure was published just after Rolex's founder, Hans Wilsdorf passed away, and I think Rolex would better serve its customers by making "GOOD WATCHES" that people can afford and obtain, than making "OFF CATALOG" models that people can't aspire to as they are so expensive and essentially unobtainable...
In other words, "I WANT A GOOD WATCH" from Rolex. Nobody wants an "UNOBTAINABLE WATCH".
































































































